|
Post by BereniceUK on Apr 18, 2017 19:49:23 GMT
Generally, it may be said there is not much sympathy for conscientious objectors, of whom there are a considerable number in the district. There are people who can work up a conscientious objection to almost anything which does not quite meet their views, and in the case of compulsory military service this method of protest is perhaps easier than any other. It smacks, however, too strongly of a desire for self-protection to be regarded with favour, and the tribunals, as well as the public, seem inclined to give short shrift to applicants for relief who cannot make their objections good. The only class of conscientious objector whose bona fides do not appear to be questioned are members of the Society of Friends, whose attitude in regard to war under any circumstances is well known. At the same time, it must be recognised that there are other people who not only object to war on general principles, but who have strong religious and conscientious grounds to personal participation in anything pertaining to militarism. They are entitled to consideration just as much as Friends, and should not be subjected to questions such as have been asked in several tribunals, which are certainly not in the best taste, and which can only be described as "playing to the gallery." (Lancaster Guardian, 11 March 1916)
|
|